|
|
|
Figure 1 shows the 1.5W, 355nm laser results. Both cuts are relatively clean with a small heat affected zone (HAZ). It took about one minute to make a complete part.
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2 shows the 3.0W, 355nm laser results. A slightly higher HAZ, but still decent quality. These parts took about 18 seconds to process at double the power of the previous.
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 3 shows the 1.5W, 266nm laser results. With one of the best cut qualities, this one still took the least time of the tested UV lasers, 12 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 4 shows the broadband RF CO2 laser. It only took about 400ms to make the cut, but it's pretty poor quality with a large HAZ.
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 5 shows the 9μm RF CO2 laser. Still can't compete with the UV lasers. This also took about 400ms.
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 6 shows the results of a line-narrowed CO2-T laser. Good cut quality, nice thin line.
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 7 shows Q-switched CO2 results. The process speed was about 700 ms and produced results comparable to the UV lasers.
|
|
|
|
|
These cuts were made with a 248nm KrF Excimer laser. The process took hours, not seconds, but note the exceptional edge quality.
|
|
|
|